My tweets

Oct. 5th, 2013 12:00 pm
rkt: (Default)
[personal profile] rkt

Date: 2013-10-05 06:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kaygigi.livejournal.com
First tweet: do they intend to mean all non-cis-male folks? Like women includes transwomen but they also want to include the genderqueers and transmen? The phrasing is problematic, but intention might vary the level of problematicness.

Date: 2013-10-08 06:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rkt.livejournal.com
i've seen it a lot on okc. it seems to may or may not include trans*women s women but excludes trans*men from being "real" men.

i've also seen it as a blanket welcoming in bluestockings type contexts (poetry slam night or whatever the phrasing is. i'm old and up past my bedtime.) as in, a space where, for a change, cis menz do not rule the night.

phrasing has definite potential for the problematic with intent varying the levels of such.



April 2017

S M T W T F S
       1
2 345678
910 11 12131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 23rd, 2026 01:11 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios