rhetorical query
Dec. 19th, 2006 11:20 pmif the usa is soooo over racism and/or sexism, and anyone who wants to challenge the sentiment is racist/sexist themselves; a communist; against 'america'; trying to cause trouble; delusional; just plan wrong, so neeener; etc. then why the hell is it even a question, never mind an out-right statement of america's "readiness", or lack thereof, for a president who is either a black man or a (white) woman?
[apparently being both black and a woman AND president is no longer even a current question.]
x-posted
[apparently being both black and a woman AND president is no longer even a current question.]
x-posted
no subject
Date: 2006-12-20 06:54 am (UTC)None of which should be read as thinking that the USA is over racism or sexism. (Seriously, it's hard to imagine anyone thinking that. Jeez, all you have to do is see the movie Borat to know how bogus that is.)
no subject
Date: 2006-12-20 08:00 pm (UTC)i'm with you on the republican thing. particularly since oh-noes, if a liberal votes for the (straight) white man, they must be prejudiced!!1!
i don't understand the deniers. really, it makes no sense.
no subject
Date: 2006-12-20 04:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-20 10:17 pm (UTC)