rkt: (image)
[personal profile] rkt
i already asked [livejournal.com profile] kaygigi this, but am i snob for thinking there is something inherently wrong with being able to buy an ac/dc back in black t-shirt - with the "artistic"-aging process so that some of the letters showing signs of "peeling" at target?

i mean, yes, i'm fully aware such shirts have long been availalbe at hot topic and the ilk, and that's a separate discussion all-together, sort of.

target is... well, target. the bastion of all that is the wholesome mid-west with the hipness that is the rest of the country. i suppose middle america, is where manya'n original ac/dc fan is now working in the business world as The (wo)Man. in theory then, this would entitle target to sell such items to that audience even more so than said hot topic who is selling the shirts to kids who weren't even born when back in black first came out. hell, i was too young to appreciate it when it first came out.

but still.

maybe it's just my im-bedded target hatin' coming out.

i don't know. but, still, i'm just saying. being able to buy a michael graves's teapot and an ac/dc t-shirt in the same venture just violates my sense of morality. which, is yes, quite skewy. which i suppose, then, should just be the moral of this post.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

April 2017

S M T W T F S
       1
2 345678
910 11 12131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 22nd, 2026 12:37 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios